The Consultants and the Clients
It is crucial for the practising lawyer that she/he must have the ability to-
- draw out facts from clients, witness or from documents,
- analyse facts clearly and concisely,
- explain the legal situation clearly to the client,
- write opinions, pleading clearly and concisely,
- explain a case clearly and to-the-point before the court ,
- keep the Court abreast of the change of law and rules and also
- remember at all time that judge is there to represent the client,
- representative is there because the client needs representing
and- representative is not there to judge the client her/himself; but
- she/he is there to find out all she/he can about the case and to do all she/he can to help the client
to achieve the end-result.Keeping in mind the above valued principles we have been serving clients for over two decades and have been providing high quality comprehensive casework services from the beginning to achieving the end result:
- initial 15 minutes advice is FREE
- diagnostic interview,
- helping to obtain required and linked documentation,
- preparation of the case,
- submission,
- making follow up where necessary and
- keeping the clients well aware of the developments.
- in the case of a refused application making full factual review request prior formal
appeal where 99percent of the refused cases in our hands successfully got the decision reversed.- If in case, at the first instance the end-result is not achieved,
- we prepare the appeal, submit with a review request to reverse the decision,
- in the appeal we represent the clients to the end.
It is our policy to be very frank with our clients and to tell the the ways the case could be won and if unfortunately not so feasible, we do not hesitate to inform clients why and suggest other alternative way by which the end-result could be to achieve the end-result. It is notable here that none of the cases we handled from it start gone that far as yet. Success of case depends on fullest disclosure of facts by the clients and follow our advice to that effect.
We are not the type of lawyers or consultants you might have a feeling otherwise; we talk to you in your own language, in a homely atmosphere and you get our full assurance of your complete confidentiality. Law require evidence. Most importantly it is the clients responsibility to supply us only the true facts and the genuine supporting documentation.
People reasonably require to seek advice and assistance. From our experience we found that many people are able to fill in the immigration application forms where it is asked to tick some boxes. When there are something to write on, those people still are able to write but may not know what particular 'word or words i.e, official terms' will be most appropriate to convince the officer concerned?
In many cases, people simply fill in the entry clearance application form and send with the required fee and wait for the British post to send the list of required documents to be sent. It is true, the British posts officials ask applicants to supply certain types of documents such as Bank Statement, pay-slips etc without which they would not be able to decide an application; they do not say so much bank balance or so much weekly earning they look for.
It is only the experienced consultants who can effectively tell what the officers look for. Memorising the immigration law may be easier; but interpreting the law is not, unless one handled many of such cases, would never know what the deciding officer looks for and what prior internal instructions have been given to the officers concerned about the ways of deciding particular types of applications!
When an application is refused, neither the Home Office nor the Entry Clearance Officer gives any details of the basis of such decisions; simply say, 'I am not satisfied ----'. No one would be able to make correct guess except the the advisor who dealt with the case what the deciding officer looked for but failed to find?
Making an application by filling in a form putting 'ticks' and 'dashes' is not that hard, but doing it correctly and sending evidence certainly is. Sending a bundle of irrelevant or inappropriate papers put the decision makers in confusion and rather makes the case complex; because officers who consider the applications are highly skilled and experienced; they know their job very well. One should no way under estimate their ability.
Imperfect application is bound to disadvantage an applicant and can make the situation even more difficult to get it right subsequently!
Applicants should do theirs if they are aware of the law and rules or should seek professional advice prior doing so!
Click here for contact details.
________________________